chucksfan1
Bronze Member
Re: New random pics
Love the one facing the wall with the nice ass (arse for an alternative!!)
Love the one facing the wall with the nice ass (arse for an alternative!!)
Re: New random pics
Does anybody know why the heel patch is covered in some pictures, is it because of advertising issues?
Does anybody know why the heel patch is covered in some pictures, is it because of advertising issues?
chucksfan1
Bronze Member
Re: New random pics
Yes, I think that is right. I have noticed some photos here in Australia (and there was one in yesterdays newspaper) where the shoes were definitely Chucks but they have blanked out the heel patch and I think you are right, for some reason they don't want any other brand name showing. I always think it takes away from the shoes - Chucks without a heel patch just aren't quite the same.
Yes, I think that is right. I have noticed some photos here in Australia (and there was one in yesterdays newspaper) where the shoes were definitely Chucks but they have blanked out the heel patch and I think you are right, for some reason they don't want any other brand name showing. I always think it takes away from the shoes - Chucks without a heel patch just aren't quite the same.
consforever
Bronze Member
Re: New random pics
Thats for sure mate... :icon_biggWalk softly people..
Thats for sure mate... :icon_biggWalk softly people..
chucktaylor
Bronze Member
chucksfan1
Bronze Member
Re: New random pics
I think you could say we were talking about either the ankle patch or the heel patch being removed. The 4th picture has the ankle patch removed and depending on where the photo originally came from (advertising of some sort), this was probably removed so as not to show some form of other brand. I saw a photo in a bank brochure earlier this year about home renovations which wasn't all that different to the above, girl with green chucks and the ankle patch removed. I'd say it is most likely that the ankle patch would be painted out digitally first as it is bigger and more obvious than the heel patch. Either way, Chucks ain't Chucks without either patch, the soles with the distinctive wording, the sweep in the rear along the back of the heel, the wide strip at the back, the side eyelets, the big chunky eyelets, the nice white laces, the rubber toe cap, the insole and converse printing, the All Star label on the lo's, the colours, the look of a sexy lady's with her feet in those shoes, and the list goes on - well, the smell if its right, the tied laces, the trashed shoes, those that the girls have written on - whatever it is that gets your juices flowing!
I think you could say we were talking about either the ankle patch or the heel patch being removed. The 4th picture has the ankle patch removed and depending on where the photo originally came from (advertising of some sort), this was probably removed so as not to show some form of other brand. I saw a photo in a bank brochure earlier this year about home renovations which wasn't all that different to the above, girl with green chucks and the ankle patch removed. I'd say it is most likely that the ankle patch would be painted out digitally first as it is bigger and more obvious than the heel patch. Either way, Chucks ain't Chucks without either patch, the soles with the distinctive wording, the sweep in the rear along the back of the heel, the wide strip at the back, the side eyelets, the big chunky eyelets, the nice white laces, the rubber toe cap, the insole and converse printing, the All Star label on the lo's, the colours, the look of a sexy lady's with her feet in those shoes, and the list goes on - well, the smell if its right, the tied laces, the trashed shoes, those that the girls have written on - whatever it is that gets your juices flowing!
OP
Re: New random pics
More pics...
More pics...
